[identity profile] particle-person.livejournal.com 2006-04-07 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Were you already an Ursula fan, or did I just make a convert? (So to speak.)

I once went through and noted how Sueish

[identity profile] bellatrys.livejournal.com 2006-04-07 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
the book that Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ was based on, that "Dolorous Passion" by Sr. Ann Emmerich, how *extraordinarily* Sueish it was.

--There's character torture. There's extreme dwelling on the details of clothing, particularly the female characters (you didn't know that what Pontius Pilate's *wife* wore was so critical to the faith, did you?) down to the embroidery. There's more character torture, by Eeeeville villains. There's discussion of the respective chest hair and tans of Jesus and his cousin John the Baptist. (I kid you not.) There's virtual self-insertion by Ann (who was a serious cutter herself) as an eyewitness to it all. And of course, character death, with the opportunity as self-insert and vicariously through the mourning women to get as maudlin-gory as she pleases.

It was kind of disturbing, in fact, to sit down for hours at a stretch and work through so much devotional lit and realize that while Ann Catherine Emmerich was kind of extreme, *most Christian devotional writing is actually fanfic*, and fanon has supplanted canon even in the existing remnants in popular imagination (Veronica's veil comes completely from a 2nd century fanfic!) and a lot of it is not just fanfic, and not just badfic, but contains *nearly* all the most common excesses of ffnet.

Okay, there isn't much slash. But h/c, and RP romances, by authors who consider themselves wedded to the main charas? If Ann Catherine had lived in this century instead of the 18th, she would have been calling herself "Krystalia" or "BoromirsLover"...