It wasn't verbally attacking everything with a penis. If it was, I wouldn't have linked to it because I'd disagree with it, too. :-) It was focused on a guy who ignored a doctor's instructions and several other warning signs in regards to his wife's health.
It was the condesending tone of the poster. It came across as 'women are blameless, men should be castrated.' Might not be what was meant, but that's how it came across.
*shrug* I honestly saw nothing of broad male/female generalizations in her talking about specific people in a specific case. (I make no claims as to everyone in the comments, since I haven't read all of those yet)
My views on the insanity defense in general are extremely muddled and jaded. It's very difficult to prove if someone was or wasn't in their right mind and responsible for their actions at the time of the crime.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject